Boeing Kill Switch

November 22, 2018

Recently an astonishing fact has come to the attention of this blogger which may or may not explain certain goings-on involving Boeing passenger planes.

Apparently, after 9/11, the US government succeeded in making Boeing install on all new as well as subsequently retrofitted Boeing planes a device which can only be described as a ‘kill switch’.

The purpose of this device is basically to give the US government the means to disable any Boeing plane while in flight and to basically crash it to prevent any repeat of the 9/11 outrage where civilian planes were flown into buildings by Saudi terrorists.

It is yet not known what the nature of this device is, whether it is electric or software-related but, when activated from the ground, it acts to disable a plane and any subsequent action by the crew to regain control of the plane results in a crash.

The upshot of the story is that, if true, certain agencies of the United States’ government can now make any Boeing passenger crash regardless who operates it or where it happens to be flying.

What’s more, relatively recent events with two of Malaysian Airways flights – MH370 and MH17 are now appear to be linked to the kill switch function which, it is claimed, was activated either inadvertently or by design or – even more disturbingly – as a live test of the kill switch which could possibly explain the disappearance of the MH370 in terms of massive U.S Government-sponsored coverup.

More investigation is however warranted into this astonishing claim as for now it remains unverified.


Keeping United States’ Crimes in Eternal Memory: Ant-Walking Alligators of Hiroshima

August 9, 2018

Forgotten Horrors: Ant-Walking Alligators of Hiroshima.

In a Nutshell

After the bomb went off, Hiroshima was transformed from a dull backwater city into a momentary vision of Hell. Among the horrors witnessed by survivors were the ‘ant-walking alligators’—creatures of the blast that seemed neither human nor animal, neither living nor dead.

The Whole Bushel

When the ‘Little Boy’ exploded 750 yards above Hiroshima during the Monday morning rush hour, no-one had ever seen anything like it. A great light filled the sky, a sound that could flatten buildings rolled across the city and 80,000 people died instantly. The statistics are rightly famous: up to 40% of the population dead, two thirds of the city destroyed and fires burning at 4,000C. But the experience of survivors in the immediate aftermath is less well-known, and far more disturbing.

In his book, Last Train to Hiroshima, Charles Pellegrino combed through thousands of eyewitness statements. Among the horrors of radiation poisoning and the initial firestorm, he uncovered one ‘creature’ unique to the atomic wasteland: the ‘ant-walking alligators’. They had once been human. When the sky exploded, they’d had the misfortune to survive. Faces turned to the blast, the skin had been seared from their skulls; leaving only a black, leathery substance without eyes or features. All that remained was a red hole where their mouths had once been. They staggered about the outskirts of Hiroshima, avoided by other survivors – but the real horror was the sound they made. According to Pellegrino: “The alligator people did not scream. Their mouths could not form the sounds. The noise they made was worse than screaming. They uttered a continuous murmur — like locusts on a midsummer night. One man, staggering on charred stumps of legs, was carrying a dead baby upside down.”

None of them survived for long. In most modern accounts of the bombing they’re noticeably absent. But the alligator people are a reminder of the human cost of our victory in the War – one we should never allow ourselves to forget.



World’s Biggest Aggressor and Terrorist By Far: The United States – 130 Years of Aggression, Interventions and Occupation The World Over

August 9, 2018

Quoting below from Dr. Zoltan Grossman’s History of U.S. Military Interventions, an important piece of research that puts things into perspective. regarding the United States’ ongoing aggression against the world



by Dr. Zoltan Grossman

The following is a partial list of U.S. military interventions from 1890 to 2014.

Below the list is a Briefing on the History of U.S. Military Interventions.

The list and briefing are also available as a powerpoint presentation.

This guide does not include:

  • mobilizations of the National Guard
  • offshore shows of naval strength
  • reinforcements of embassy personnel
  • the use of non-Defense Department personnel (such as the Drug Enforcement Administration)
  • military exercises
  • non-combat mobilizations (such as replacing postal strikers)
  • the permanent stationing of armed forces
  • covert actions where the U.S. did not play a command and control role
  • the use of small hostage rescue units
  • most uses of proxy troops
  • U.S. piloting of foreign warplanes
  • foreign or domestic disaster assistance
  • military training and advisory programs not involving direct combat
  • civic action programs
  • and many other military activities.

Among sources used, beside news reports, are the Congressional Record (23 June 1969), 180 Landings by the U.S. Marine Corp History Division, Ege & Makhijani in Counterspy (July-Aug, 1982), “Instances of Use of United States Forces Abroad, 1798-1993” by Ellen C. Collier of the Library of Congress Congressional Research Service, and Ellsberg in Protest & Survive.

Versions of this list have been published on,, and numerous other websites.

Translations of list: Spanish French Turkish Italian Chinese Greek Russian Czech Tamil Portuguese

Quotes in Christian Science Monitor and The Independent

Turkish newspaper urges that the United States be listed in Guinness Book of World Records as the Country with the Most Foreign Interventions.

Read the rest of this entry »

Portonblimp Down Episode 2 – A Tale By Boris Johnson by Craig Murray

April 10, 2018

“Comrade Putin, we have successfully stockpiled novichoks in secret for ten years, and kept them hidden from the OPCW inspectors. We have also trained our agents in secret novichok assassination techniques. The programme has cost hundreds of millions of dollars, but now we are ready. Naturally, the first time we use it we will expose our secret and suffer massive international blowback. So who should be our first target? The head of a foreign intelligence agency? A leading jihadist rebel in Syria? A key nuclear scientist? Even a Head of State?”

“No, Tovarishch. There is this old retired guy I know living in Salisbury. We released him from jail years ago…”

“With respect Comrade Putin, are you sure he is the most important target to reveal a programme we have put so much resource into for ten years?”

“Yes. I sit here every day and I cannot concentrate on the affairs of Russia or the World as all the time am thinking of Sergei Skripal. I should never have let him out of jail to spend his life buying lottery tickets and eating in Zizzis. But you must make absolutely certain to kill him.”

“Don’t worry Comrade Putin, we have been training in secret novichok assassination techniques for ten years. We even have a detailed manual explaining our methods. We will spread the novichok on his outside door handle (fiendish laugh).”

“Are you sure comrade? Is there not a danger it will wash off or get diluted?”

“No Comrade Putin, it never rains in England.”

That is, genuinely, in every detail the official British government version of what happened in Salisbury, including the ten year programme and the secret assassination manual.

Despite this story being one of the most improbably wild conspiracy theories in human history, it is those who express any doubt at all as to its veracity who are smeared as “conspiracy theorists” or even “traitors”.

All copyright on this article is waived. Feel free to use, translate and republish as you wish.

Raw File: Debunking “Syrian Government Chemical Attack” Conspiracies

April 8, 2018

Postol debunks Kaszeta and Eliot Higgins (Black Moses) (opens PDF)



Britain’s Toxic Dagger vs Skripals

March 26, 2018

Chemical warfare







Toxic dagger 4

WaPo: Shashi Tharoor: In Winston Churchill, Hollywood rewards a mass murderer

March 12, 2018

WaPo: Shashi Tharoor: In Winston Churchill, Hollywood rewards a mass murderer


Shashi Tharoor is author of “Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India.” He chairs the Indian Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee.

“History,” Winston Churchill said, “will be kind to me, for I intend to write it myself.” He needn’t have bothered. He was one of the great mass murderers of the 20th century, yet is the only one, unlike Hitler and Stalin, to have escaped historical odium in the West. He has been crowned with a Nobel Prize (for literature, no less), and now, an actor portraying him (Gary Oldman) has been awarded an Oscar.

As Hollywood confirms, Churchill’s reputation (as what Harold Evans has called “the British Lionheart on the ramparts of civilization”) rests almost entirely on his stirring rhetoric and his talent for a fine phrase during World War II. “We shall not flag nor fail. We shall go on to the end. … We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets. … We shall never surrender.” (The revisionist British historian John Charmley dismissed this as “sublime nonsense.”)

Words, in the end, are all that Churchill admirers can point to. His actions are another matter altogether.

During World War II, Churchill declared himself in favor of “terror bombing.” He wrote that he wanted “absolutely devastating, exterminating attacks by very heavy bombers.” Horrors such as the firebombing of Dresden were the result.

In the fight for Irish independence, Churchill, in his capacity as secretary of state for war and air, was one of the few British officials in favor of bombing Irish protesters, suggesting in 1920 that airplanes should use “machine-gun fire or bombs” to scatter them.

Dealing with unrest in Mesopotamia in 1921, as secretary of state for the colonies, Churchill acted as a war criminal: “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against the uncivilised tribes; it would spread a lively terror.” He ordered large-scale bombing of Mesopotamia, with an entire village wiped out in 45 minutes.

In Afghanistan, Churchill declared that the Pashtuns “needed to recognise the superiority of [the British] race” and that “all who resist will be killed without quarter.” He wrote: “We proceeded systematically, village by village, and we destroyed the houses, filled up the wells, blew down the towers, cut down the great shady trees, burned the crops and broke the reservoirs in punitive devastation. … Every tribesman caught was speared or cut down at once.”

In Kenya, Churchill either directed or was complicit in policies involving the forced relocation of local people from the fertile highlands to make way for white colonial settlers and the forcing of more than 150,000 people into concentration camps. Rape, castration, lit cigarettes on tender spots, and electric shocks were all used by the British authorities to torture Kenyans under Churchill’s rule.

But the principal victims of Winston Churchill were the Indians — “a beastly people with a beastly religion,” as he charmingly called them. He wanted to use chemical weapons in India but was shot down by his cabinet colleagues, whom he criticized for their “squeamishness,” declaring that “the objections of the India Office to the use of gas against natives are unreasonable.”

Churchill’s beatification as an apostle of freedom seems all the more preposterous given his 1941 declaration that the Atlantic Charter’s principles would not apply to India and the colored colonies. He refused to see people of color as entitled to the same rights as himself. “Gandhi-ism and all it stands for,” he declared, “will, sooner or later, have to be grappled with and finally crushed.”

In such matters, Churchill was the most reactionary of Englishmen, with views so extreme they cannot be excused as being reflective of their times. Even his own secretary of state for India, Leopold Amery, confessed that he could see very little difference between Churchill’s attitude and Adolf Hitler’s.

Thanks to Churchill, some 4 million Bengalis starved to death in a 1943 famine. Churchill ordered the diversion of food from starving Indian civilians to well-supplied British soldiers and even to top up European stockpiles in Greece and elsewhere. When reminded of the suffering of his Indian victims, his response was that the famine was their own fault, he said, for “breeding like rabbits.”

Madhusree Mukerjee’s searing account of Churchill’s role in the Bengal famine, “Churchill’s Secret War,” documents that while Indians starved, prices for foodgrains were inflated by British purchases and India’s own surplus grains were exported, while Australian ships laden with wheat were not allowed to unload their cargo at Calcutta (where the bodies of those who had died of starvation littered the streets). Instead, Churchill ordered that grain be shipped to storage depots in the Mediterranean and the Balkans to increase the buffer stocks for a possible future invasion of Greece and Yugoslavia. European warehouses filled up as Bengalis died.

This week’s Oscar rewards yet another hagiography of this odious man. To the Iraqis whom Churchill advocated gassing, the Greek protesters on the streets of Athens who were mowed down on Churchill’s orders in 1944, sundry Pashtuns and Irish, as well as to Indians like myself, it will always be a mystery why a few bombastic speeches have been enough to wash the bloodstains off Churchill’s racist hands.

Many of us will remember Churchill as a war criminal and an enemy of decency and humanity, a blinkered imperialist untroubled by the oppression of non-white peoples. Ultimately, his great failure — his long darkest hour — was his constant effort to deny us freedom.

Litvinenko Case: MI6 Plot to Poison Putin

March 10, 2018

Seeing as agents of the British state may have committed another poisoning outrage in their own country (see Skripal), it may be instructive to revisit the true story of the Litvinenko case, with which some parallels have already been drawn.

Analysis has revealed the following likely scenario:

Britain’s MI6, which is the external security and intelligence police of the British state, had developed a plan to poison Russian President Vladimir Putin with the aid of one Boris Berezovsky, an exile from Russia and MI6 agent, an embittered and unscrupulous individual.

Berezovsky then drafted his minion Litvinenko who was on his payroll and heavily indebted to him both financially and otherwise.

On MI6 orders relayed by Berezovsky, Litvinenko contacted two fellow former KGB officers – Lugovoi and Kovtun who were supposed to collect the poison (Polonium 210) likely smuggled into Britain from Israel and deliver it to an unknown third party who could try to get in contact with Putin.

The choice of Lugovoi and Kovtun by Litvinenko was due to the fact that he believed they had reason to hate Putin personally: Lugovoi even did some jail time, the security careers of both were terminated under Putin.

Existing Polonium 210 traces led from Britain to Russia but none were found to lead from Russia to Britain.

But the plan backfired spectacularly as during the second meeting, rather than going ahead with the plan, Messrs. Lugovoi and Kovtun had a change of heart (or possibly had been playing Litvinenko from day one) and fed the dangerous substance to the plotter i.e. the hapless would-be poisonist Litvinenko himself.

The rest, as they say, is history.

And, despite being literally the perpetrators, the British state and its various officials and Britain’s subservient and corrupt lying media milked the tragedy for all it was worth in terms of propaganda.


Britain’s Wide Ranging Doping Program Across All Sports #IOC #WADA

February 23, 2018

Britain Refuses to Admit to Wide Ranging Doping Program Across All Sports

Britain still refuses to admit to, or properly investigate, the existence of a wide ranging and multi-level doping program across all British Olympic sports, both summer and winter.

Unprecedented in the history of the Olympic movement, Britain’s quantum leap in the medal tables at London 2012 and Rio 2016 can only be explained in terms of mass institutionalized and government sponsored and/or protected doping.

If it isn’t doping then it could only have been genetic superiority.

But it can’t be genetic superiority because the concept of genetic superiority was disproved at about the time the last race of super humans (aka Nazis) was defeated in 1945.

Also, the idea of the British claiming genetic superiority in anything let alone sports is frankly laughable.

So it’s undoubtedly doping.

Will all their competitive medalists in endurance and non-technical sports being therefore certain dopers, Britain dopes on a massive scale utilizing all means at disposal, including:

  • Collusion with Wada which allows Britain to have its athletes’ test falsified in WADA-controlled labs and make them appear clean.
  • Use of new doping substances, constant ongoing pharmaceutical research into new PEDs and ways of doping in Britain.
  • Research into ways of beating doping controls and use of better masking agents.
  • Corrupting and undermining WADA, IOC and other world sports governing bodies.
  • Abuse of TUEs, with an overwhelming majority of athletes given TUEs on false pretenses being from Britain and the United States.
  • Tarnishing Britain’s competitors which again involves routine falsification of test results by WADA laboratories to make them appear positive

Hold British and US cheats to account!

Demand investigation into institutionalized doping in Britain and the United States, punishment and suspension of all British and US athletes mired in doping and that includes ALL their winners and medalists for at least the past 40 years.

Though it may seem hard to believe, the United States is even more guilty of doping offenses than Britain, all its winners in non-technical sports for the past 40+ years are all beneficiaries of illegal PED stimulation: all those horrible multiple dopers Phelpses, Williamses, Lance Armstrongs etc. etc.

London 2012. The Doped Up Olympics. How Britain Undermines International Sports by Letting all its Athletes Use Doping #Wada #IOC

February 23, 2018


In the 2012 London Olympics, British athletes won 65 medals all of a sudden – their biggest tally for over 100 years – since the 1908 London Olympics when they won 148 medals.

Is there an innocent explanation to this British miracle?

Of course not.

In 1908 British athletes won so many medals because they were already doping, but doping was not yet banned then.

And while doping WAS banned in 2012, British athletes were certainly doing it again at the London Games and with a vengeance.

That is indeed the only explanation for their sudden home-soil successes — that there was a well-hidden government sponsored doping program in Britain prior to the 2012 Olympics presided probably by Lordling Coe himself, and also that they were able to interfere with the way the anti-doping labs were operated during London 2012 to make sure their cheats wouldn’t be caught.

British track…

View original post 196 more words

%d bloggers like this: