Archive for the ‘Britain versus the World’ Category

Portonblimp Down Episode 2 – A Tale By Boris Johnson by Craig Murray

April 10, 2018

“Comrade Putin, we have successfully stockpiled novichoks in secret for ten years, and kept them hidden from the OPCW inspectors. We have also trained our agents in secret novichok assassination techniques. The programme has cost hundreds of millions of dollars, but now we are ready. Naturally, the first time we use it we will expose our secret and suffer massive international blowback. So who should be our first target? The head of a foreign intelligence agency? A leading jihadist rebel in Syria? A key nuclear scientist? Even a Head of State?”

“No, Tovarishch. There is this old retired guy I know living in Salisbury. We released him from jail years ago…”

“With respect Comrade Putin, are you sure he is the most important target to reveal a programme we have put so much resource into for ten years?”

“Yes. I sit here every day and I cannot concentrate on the affairs of Russia or the World as all the time am thinking of Sergei Skripal. I should never have let him out of jail to spend his life buying lottery tickets and eating in Zizzis. But you must make absolutely certain to kill him.”

“Don’t worry Comrade Putin, we have been training in secret novichok assassination techniques for ten years. We even have a detailed manual explaining our methods. We will spread the novichok on his outside door handle (fiendish laugh).”

“Are you sure comrade? Is there not a danger it will wash off or get diluted?”

“No Comrade Putin, it never rains in England.”

That is, genuinely, in every detail the official British government version of what happened in Salisbury, including the ten year programme and the secret assassination manual.

Despite this story being one of the most improbably wild conspiracy theories in human history, it is those who express any doubt at all as to its veracity who are smeared as “conspiracy theorists” or even “traitors”.

All copyright on this article is waived. Feel free to use, translate and republish as you wish.

Advertisements

Britain’s Toxic Dagger vs Skripals

March 26, 2018

Chemical warfare

 

 

 

 

 

More

Toxic dagger 4

WaPo: Shashi Tharoor: In Winston Churchill, Hollywood rewards a mass murderer

March 12, 2018

WaPo: Shashi Tharoor: In Winston Churchill, Hollywood rewards a mass murderer

Quote:

Shashi Tharoor is author of “Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India.” He chairs the Indian Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee.

“History,” Winston Churchill said, “will be kind to me, for I intend to write it myself.” He needn’t have bothered. He was one of the great mass murderers of the 20th century, yet is the only one, unlike Hitler and Stalin, to have escaped historical odium in the West. He has been crowned with a Nobel Prize (for literature, no less), and now, an actor portraying him (Gary Oldman) has been awarded an Oscar.

As Hollywood confirms, Churchill’s reputation (as what Harold Evans has called “the British Lionheart on the ramparts of civilization”) rests almost entirely on his stirring rhetoric and his talent for a fine phrase during World War II. “We shall not flag nor fail. We shall go on to the end. … We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets. … We shall never surrender.” (The revisionist British historian John Charmley dismissed this as “sublime nonsense.”)

Words, in the end, are all that Churchill admirers can point to. His actions are another matter altogether.

During World War II, Churchill declared himself in favor of “terror bombing.” He wrote that he wanted “absolutely devastating, exterminating attacks by very heavy bombers.” Horrors such as the firebombing of Dresden were the result.

In the fight for Irish independence, Churchill, in his capacity as secretary of state for war and air, was one of the few British officials in favor of bombing Irish protesters, suggesting in 1920 that airplanes should use “machine-gun fire or bombs” to scatter them.

Dealing with unrest in Mesopotamia in 1921, as secretary of state for the colonies, Churchill acted as a war criminal: “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against the uncivilised tribes; it would spread a lively terror.” He ordered large-scale bombing of Mesopotamia, with an entire village wiped out in 45 minutes.

In Afghanistan, Churchill declared that the Pashtuns “needed to recognise the superiority of [the British] race” and that “all who resist will be killed without quarter.” He wrote: “We proceeded systematically, village by village, and we destroyed the houses, filled up the wells, blew down the towers, cut down the great shady trees, burned the crops and broke the reservoirs in punitive devastation. … Every tribesman caught was speared or cut down at once.”

In Kenya, Churchill either directed or was complicit in policies involving the forced relocation of local people from the fertile highlands to make way for white colonial settlers and the forcing of more than 150,000 people into concentration camps. Rape, castration, lit cigarettes on tender spots, and electric shocks were all used by the British authorities to torture Kenyans under Churchill’s rule.

But the principal victims of Winston Churchill were the Indians — “a beastly people with a beastly religion,” as he charmingly called them. He wanted to use chemical weapons in India but was shot down by his cabinet colleagues, whom he criticized for their “squeamishness,” declaring that “the objections of the India Office to the use of gas against natives are unreasonable.”

Churchill’s beatification as an apostle of freedom seems all the more preposterous given his 1941 declaration that the Atlantic Charter’s principles would not apply to India and the colored colonies. He refused to see people of color as entitled to the same rights as himself. “Gandhi-ism and all it stands for,” he declared, “will, sooner or later, have to be grappled with and finally crushed.”

In such matters, Churchill was the most reactionary of Englishmen, with views so extreme they cannot be excused as being reflective of their times. Even his own secretary of state for India, Leopold Amery, confessed that he could see very little difference between Churchill’s attitude and Adolf Hitler’s.

Thanks to Churchill, some 4 million Bengalis starved to death in a 1943 famine. Churchill ordered the diversion of food from starving Indian civilians to well-supplied British soldiers and even to top up European stockpiles in Greece and elsewhere. When reminded of the suffering of his Indian victims, his response was that the famine was their own fault, he said, for “breeding like rabbits.”

Madhusree Mukerjee’s searing account of Churchill’s role in the Bengal famine, “Churchill’s Secret War,” documents that while Indians starved, prices for foodgrains were inflated by British purchases and India’s own surplus grains were exported, while Australian ships laden with wheat were not allowed to unload their cargo at Calcutta (where the bodies of those who had died of starvation littered the streets). Instead, Churchill ordered that grain be shipped to storage depots in the Mediterranean and the Balkans to increase the buffer stocks for a possible future invasion of Greece and Yugoslavia. European warehouses filled up as Bengalis died.

This week’s Oscar rewards yet another hagiography of this odious man. To the Iraqis whom Churchill advocated gassing, the Greek protesters on the streets of Athens who were mowed down on Churchill’s orders in 1944, sundry Pashtuns and Irish, as well as to Indians like myself, it will always be a mystery why a few bombastic speeches have been enough to wash the bloodstains off Churchill’s racist hands.

Many of us will remember Churchill as a war criminal and an enemy of decency and humanity, a blinkered imperialist untroubled by the oppression of non-white peoples. Ultimately, his great failure — his long darkest hour — was his constant effort to deny us freedom.

Litvinenko Case: MI6 Plot to Poison Putin

March 10, 2018

Seeing as agents of the British state may have committed another poisoning outrage in their own country (see Skripal), it may be instructive to revisit the true story of the Litvinenko case, with which some parallels have already been drawn.

Analysis has revealed the following likely scenario:

Britain’s MI6, which is the external security and intelligence police of the British state, had developed a plan to poison Russian President Vladimir Putin with the aid of one Boris Berezovsky, an exile from Russia and MI6 agent, an embittered and unscrupulous individual.

Berezovsky then drafted his minion Litvinenko who was on his payroll and heavily indebted to him both financially and otherwise.

On MI6 orders relayed by Berezovsky, Litvinenko contacted two fellow former KGB officers – Lugovoi and Kovtun who were supposed to collect the poison (Polonium 210) likely smuggled into Britain from Israel and deliver it to an unknown third party who could try to get in contact with Putin.

The choice of Lugovoi and Kovtun by Litvinenko was due to the fact that he believed they had reason to hate Putin personally: Lugovoi even did some jail time, the security careers of both were terminated under Putin.

Existing Polonium 210 traces led from Britain to Russia but none were found to lead from Russia to Britain.

But the plan backfired spectacularly as during the second meeting, rather than going ahead with the plan, Messrs. Lugovoi and Kovtun had a change of heart (or possibly had been playing Litvinenko from day one) and fed the dangerous substance to the plotter i.e. the hapless would-be poisonist Litvinenko himself.

The rest, as they say, is history.

And, despite being literally the perpetrators, the British state and its various officials and Britain’s subservient and corrupt lying media milked the tragedy for all it was worth in terms of propaganda.

 

Britain’s Genocides and Mass Murder

December 24, 2017

After a post on the United States’ death toll on humanity, it is now time to look at Britain, aka the self-styled “Great” Britain, aka the “United Kingdom”, aka England.

Britain is strongly linked to Capitalism which is the most evil socioeconomic system that has ever existed.

In fact, Britain was a pioneer and early adopter of Capitalism and so caused a great share of Capitalist crimes against humanity, second only to the United States.

Here’s an incomplete list of Britain’s genocides and mass murder campaigns:

1,500,000 Irish Potato Famine

6,000,000 Colonization of Australia, New Zealand, resulting in a genocide of the Aborigine peoples, a unique human race wiped-out.

75,000 Second Boer War

116,000 Burma-Siam Railroad Construction

10,000,000 Bengal Famine of 1943, engineered by Winston Churchill

30,000,000 Famine in British India, engineered by successive British Governments

500,000 Iraq (Desert Storm), Britain was America’s most committed ally

1,200,000 Invasion of Afghanistan, again Britain contributed

1,300,000 Invasion of Iraq, Britain is an important member of the Mother of All Coalitions

3,500,000 South African Apartheid Regime Death Toll, Britain for the most part being supportive of the Apartheid regime

30,000 North of Ireland, “troubles”

6,000,000 Japanese Imperialism, nurtured and encouraged by Britain at early stages

10,000,000 Korean War, Britain involved

20,000,000 British Occupation of India

95,000,000 Native American Genocide

150,000,000 African Slave Trade, principal perpetrator being Britain, even when Britain “abolished” the trade it compensated the slave-runners not the victims

15,000,000 Indented labor, Britain replaced slaves with indented laborers from places like India.

80,000,000 British Empire’s death toll in Asia, Africa, and the Pacific area over centuries of colonization, oppression and exploitation and ultimately terror.

The Grand total of deaths caused by Britain would appear to be greater than the same of the United States and is currently at about 441 million mark.

It would appear therefore that the so-called Great Britain is truly Great only in the massive crimes of genocide and murder that it committed and, some would say, continues to commit, albeit on a smaller scale as of the last half a century.

Breaking News: Britain’s Fallon Threatens Hackers with Air Strikes

June 27, 2017

Britain could launch air strikes on hackers, Britain’s Defense Secretary warned today.

Britain’s Michael Fallon sent out a tough message to hackers in the wake of recent attacks on British networks.

He said the UK had the ability to respond to online attacks from any domain – air, land or sea.

According to Fallon, this was signalling to potential cyber strikers that the price of an online attack could invite a response from any domain – air, land, sea.

He also hinted that Britain’s newest future shipwreck – the so-called Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier – could be used for the purpose.

Chinese Curse on the English

June 27, 2017

The UK now almost poses like the best friend China has ever had or will be lucky to have in the future.

But the fact of the matter is the British, and in particular the English, waged wars and made attacks against the Chinese such as the Opium Wars and the Boxer Rebellion and the forced sale of opium drugs in China causing much suffering and misery to the Chinese populace.

So much so that some Chinese villages in Guangdong came up with a curse against the English which goes on like this:

“We note that you English barbarians have formed the habits and developed the nature of wolves, plundering and seizing things by force.

We patriots have received the favor of the Celestial Dynasty in nourishing us for two centuries. Today, if we do not exterminate you English barbarians, we are not human beings. You [the English] have killed and injured our common people in many villages and seriously hurt the universal harmony. You also completely destroyed the coffins in several places, and you disastrously destroyed the Buddhist statues in several monasteries.

This is the time when Heaven is angered and mankind is resentful, even the ghosts and spirits will not tolerate you beasts (the English)”.

In light of recent events, I wonder if this curse still has power.

How Britain Killed its Way Around the World

October 27, 2015

During India’s 1st War of Independence dubbed by Britain’s lying historians the “Indian Mutiny”, British troops employed a particularly brutal method of killing prisoners of war.

England kills

Brits tied their captives to field guns and then lighted the fuse tearing their bodies apart while alive as the guns fired.

England kills 2

Prince Andrew Sex Crimes

January 11, 2015

Prince Andrew, aka the Duke of York, was named recently in an under age sex lawsuit.

You can read about it, for example, here.

The Buckingham Palace issued a couple of denials… as they would really… they have the institution to protect.

It’s interesting to look at this Duke of York character… another inbred degenerate English Royal… the infusion of some fresh blood (such as it was) into the Royal line happened too late for Andrew, though he is not harmless at all.

Wikileaks has a nice dump of documents on him.

Prince Andrew the Geographer

Prince Andrew the Big Game Playa… and he aims to win it this time make no mistake about it.
Note the tone of the US reviewer… “his mother’s subjects..” etc.

All WikiLeaks dox on Prince Andrew

Pedo prince

Pedo prince is happy to be an inbred degenerate

White Slavery on Rise in Britain

December 1, 2014

A BBC website piece – BBC News – Slavery levels in UK ‘higher than thought’

It says that there could be between 10,000 and 13,000 slaves in the UK, higher than previous figures, analysis for the Home Office suggests.

Modern slavery victims are said to include women forced into prostitution, “imprisoned” domestic staff and workers in fields, factories and fishing boats.

It said the victims included people trafficked from more than 100 countries – the most prevalent being Albania, Nigeria, Vietnam and Romania – as well as British-born adults and children.

A few things to note here.

Slavery is about the only thing that Britain could do well.

It appears Britain can’t quite forget its legacy of being the principal slave master of the world and one that extracted the most benefit from slavery. Huge capital inflows from massive operations to capture, transport and sell black Africans to slave owners in its overseas colonies funded Britain’s “industrial revolution” at the time which allowed the country to come to the fore of leading nations, albeit briefly.

Most of the economic assets that Britain still has were engendered by the bloody toils of the African black slave in one way or another and date back to the time of black slavery.

Now of course it cannot replicate anything remotely similar to its former government-funded slave running operations so it now turns its attention to “white” slavery… making slaves principally of white Eastern Europeans as well as of own British citizens, including thousands of British underage girls effectively toiling in the harems of criminal elements within the British Pakistani community.

Also, the British Government has been raising a huge stink in Europe and on the international arena recently all about depriving even immigrants from the EU of benefits hoping and even expecting that more will be driven into slavery and exploited in Britain for free.


%d bloggers like this: