Archive for the ‘MI5’ Category

2017 Manchester Arena Bombing: MI5 Responsible, Elites in Disbelief

June 2, 2017

My analysis of limited and incomplete information as well as MSM decoding and also my decoding of the British propaganda outlet of the BBC lead me to believe that MI5 (and MI6) could be involved in the 2017 May Manchester Arena bombing and that the British Government and the elites were and still are in shock and awe of the bombing, and are in a state of utter disbelief.

It was especially instructive to watch how the BBC News website was reporting the tragedy in the early stages.

It looked as if they couldn’t believe that it could happen in Britain: they did not give the news the headline spot, they started live reporting and then removed it several times and even kept claiming that it could be “some pyros” or a “blown speaker” or a “faulty lighting fixture” when other news outlets were already reporting multiple fatalities.

Since the BBC is nothing but a propaganda arm of the British government, it reflected the shock and awe and the utter disbelief that the lower tiers of the British government and the British elites were experiencing in the wake of the bombing.

Why couldn’t they believe it?

They couldn’t believe it was happening in Britain because of the sheer amount of effort they put into controlling Islamist terror, nurturing it, diverting it elsewhere and encouraging and even guiding it to hit other places and nations.

For example, MI6 set up and curates the so-called “Syrian Observatory”, a terrorist propaganda front, and the British government has been using it to shift the wrath of Islamists on other anti-terror actors like the United States, France or Assad’s Syria itself. There are many other such examples.

Not only the British government encourages Islamist terror, it has penetrated it with multiple agents, it sponsors and leads it on in the hope that there is only so much of it in the world and while Islamist terror is targeting other nations there won’t be enough left to hit Britain with.

Quite cynically the British government and its top security MI5 and MI6 goons believe that while terrorist acts are happening elsewhere Britain is safe and the safer the more there is Islamist terror elsewhere. For this reason they work hard to encourage Islamists to hit various other nations, like France, Belgium, Sweden etc.

Recently the British government said it could withdraw intelligence from the EU post-Brexit thereby de-facto threatening France and other EU nations with acts of Islamist terror by factions that they control and also by factions that they don’t control outright but influence and attempt to guide with their propaganda.

However, while the lower tiers of the British government and the ruling elites were in a state of disbelief, those at the very top were much better informed.

There is a distinct probability that the whole heinous thing could have been ordered from the very top of the British security apparatus.

There should be no doubt that MI5 was directly or indirectly involved in the atrocity as they had been in the previous such acts.

Cui bono analysis definitely implicates the current conservative British government as the only ones standing (and hoping) to gain and benefit from the terrorist act, and MI5 (and MI6) are their servants, the former being Britain’s internal state Gestapo-style terror police, the latter, the external branch of the same.

Salman Abedi was again “known to MI5” (which is really code for MI5 agents) and yet was allowed to operate with impunity, including apparent multiple trips to war zones in Syria and Libya.

In the police state of Britain – with near total round-the-clock surveillance of everyone, it can only mean that he was being used by the MI5 either directly or indirectly.

Either he had been recruited by MI5 and was their agent or they watched and allowed him to operate, possibly leading him on as they like to do.

The reasons for such criminal behavior are too many to enumerate all.

For starters, Cui bono analysis indicates the bombing is generally thought to favor PM May and to undermine Corbin in the forthcoming elections so could be directly ordered by her or her top government goons.

For the main course, there’s the fact that MI5 still needs to eat meaning funding, status, promotions and decorations and there is nothing like a terror bombing to achieve all that and to secure the future for the foreseeable as it was done on 7/7.

Also, the bomb appears too sophisticated so could be the work of MI5 technicians.

What’s more, the choice of target – mainly pre-teen and teen girls – is also consistent with MI5 (and MI6) involvement where there is institutionalized hate of children, women and especially young women for the reason of these agencies of the British state being dominated by individuals with criminal homosexual and pedophiliac / pedophobic tendencies which is well documented.

In sum, while the British elites were in utter disbelief given how they are good friends with Islamist terror, the very select few in Britain have a much better knowledge of the reasons for, and the genesis of, the bombing carried out by the fall guy Abedi.

22 March 2017 London Attack: MI5 Strikes Again

March 23, 2017

Today, one day after the March 22, 2017 terrorist attack on the Westminster bridge in London, there is an admission that the attacker “was known to MI5”.

“Was known to MI5” is actually code for MI5 agents who go rogue and commit terrorist atrocities or who commit atrocities without actually going rogue.

Whether he was rogue or not, there is a very strong case for the culpability of MI5 in this latest terrorist atrocity as in the previous ones.

It is inconceivable that in the repressive police state that is Britain today anyone could commit such an act without the support of, or a card blanche from, MI5, Britain’s GESTAPO style internal state police, much less someone who “was known to MI5”.

Did MI5 do it again?

MI5

Jo Cox Murder: MI5 At It Again?

June 20, 2016

The key forensic question to ask with regard to the murder of British MP Jo Cox is Cui bono? aka “in whose benefit”?

And the answer would implicate the British government which is majority pro-EU and Remain, a campaign to stay in the EU.

Only they stand and have already stood to gain from Jo Cox’ murder.

The answer would also strongly implicate Britain’s internal GESTAPO-style police – called MI5.

The MO is also entirely theirs – using a deranged person, either their agent or a person influenced, monitored and allowed to operate by them, to make a political assassination (this case) or to commit a terrorist outrage (7/7).

They also like to kill women specifically for the reason of being dominated by people with homosexual and paedophiliac tendencies.

The murder of Jill Dando may be treated as a precedent here.

Other than that they specialize in “suiciding” people opposing the British government.

It seems that MI5’s “intervention” has met with an unqualified success — today’s reports are all about Remain surging and the pre-murder Leave momentum seemingly broken.

So, can we put this assassination down as another terrorist act by Britain’s terror police – the MI5?

Answer in the comment section.

MI5 in Old Trafford Terror Plot

May 16, 2016

MI5 does it again.

The Old Trafford bomb scare is more than meets the eye.

Using the powers of deduction and analysis of limited information and MSM decoding as well as the study of precedents, this author is convinced Britain has just barely escaped another MI5 organized terrorist outrage like 7/7.

What really happened in Manchester yesterday is that MI5 operatives themselves likely placed a bomb at the Old Trafford facilities and were going to commit another major terrorist act on British soil to blame it then on Muslims or, maybe, on some IRA splinter group.

At MI5, they desperately need another major terrorist act to get increased funding which has started to dry out again, more resources as well as promotions and decorations like they managed to get in the wake of the 7/7 terrorist act.

However, when their plans were thwarted and the bomb was found before it could go off, they launched a major disinformation and PR campaign designed to convince the public the device was not viable and it was all just a cock-up in training.

If you believe that you will believe anything.

7/7? MI5 Did It

July 6, 2015
Culpable: MI5

Culpable: MI5

 

Que bono?

Investigations into the 7/7 atrocity were completed but produced no evidence whatsoever of any terrorist involvement.

Instead, to a thinking person, they showed plenty of sign that the regime designated “terrorists” were shadowed at the time — no, even led on by MI5 — Britain’s internal secret state police modeled on Nazi Germany’s Gestapo but more ruthless and unprincipled.

MI5 needed a major boost in funding at the time and was facing a post-Cold war identity crisis and really could use a couple of spectacular bombings — preferably with multiple casualties, to say nothing of the fact that the “bombers” turned out to be MI5 agents themselves, whether rogue or otherwise, doesn’t really matter from the viewpoint of establishing and proving MI5 culpability.

7/7 was a masterstroke – a stroke of (evil) genius on the part of MI5. It got funding, elevated status, more rights and powers, assured future as a government agency; it got the chance to blame Muslims, to get rid of its troublesome agents, and some within MI5 ranks got medals, promotions and pay increases, even as the victims were still being treated in hospitals.

Que bono?

Only MI5 bono.

MI5 Did It

July 7, 2013
Culpable: MI5

Culpable: MI5

Que bono?

Investigations into the 7/7 atrocity were completed but produced no evidence whatsoever of any terrorist involvement.

Instead, to a thinking person, they showed plenty of sign that the regime designated “terrorists” were shadowed at the time — no, even led on by MI5 — Britain’s internal secret state police modeled on Nazi Germany’s Gestapo but more ruthless and unprincipled.

MI5 needed a major boost in funding at the time and was facing a post-Cold war identity crisis and really could use a couple of spectacular bombings — preferably with multiple casualties, to say nothing of the fact that the “bombers” turned out to be MI5 agents themselves, whether rogue or otherwise, doesn’t really matter from the viewpoint of establishing and proving MI5 culpability.

7/7 was a masterstroke – a stroke of (evil) genius on the part of MI5. It got funding, elevated status, more rights and powers, assured future as a government agency; it got the chance to blame Muslims, to get rid of its troublesome agents, and some within MI5 ranks got medals, promotions and pay increases, even as the victims were still being treated in hospitals.

Que bono?

Only MI5 bono.


%d bloggers like this: