Breaking News: Britain’s Fallon Threatens Hackers with Air Strikes

June 27, 2017

Britain could launch air strikes on hackers, Britain’s Defense Secretary warned today.

Britain’s Michael Fallon sent out a tough message to hackers in the wake of recent attacks on British networks.

He said the UK had the ability to respond to online attacks from any domain – air, land or sea.

According to Fallon, this was signalling to potential cyber strikers that the price of an online attack could invite a response from any domain – air, land, sea.

He also hinted that Britain’s newest future shipwreck – the so-called Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier – could be used for the purpose.

Advertisements

Chinese Curse on the English

June 27, 2017

The UK now almost poses like the best friend China has ever had or will be lucky to have in the future.

But the fact of the matter is the British, and in particular the English, waged wars and made attacks against the Chinese such as the Opium Wars and the Boxer Rebellion and the forced sale of opium drugs in China causing much suffering and misery to the Chinese populace.

So much so that some Chinese villages in Guangdong came up with a curse against the English which goes on like this:

“We note that you English barbarians have formed the habits and developed the nature of wolves, plundering and seizing things by force.

We patriots have received the favor of the Celestial Dynasty in nourishing us for two centuries. Today, if we do not exterminate you English barbarians, we are not human beings. You [the English] have killed and injured our common people in many villages and seriously hurt the universal harmony. You also completely destroyed the coffins in several places, and you disastrously destroyed the Buddhist statues in several monasteries.

This is the time when Heaven is angered and mankind is resentful, even the ghosts and spirits will not tolerate you beasts (the English)”.

In light of recent events, I wonder if this curse still has power.

2017 Manchester Arena Bombing: MI5 Responsible, Elites in Disbelief

June 2, 2017

My analysis of limited and incomplete information as well as MSM decoding and also my decoding of the British propaganda outlet of the BBC lead me to believe that MI5 (and MI6) could be involved in the 2017 May Manchester Arena bombing and that the British Government and the elites were and still are in shock and awe of the bombing, and are in a state of utter disbelief.

It was especially instructive to watch how the BBC News website was reporting the tragedy in the early stages.

It looked as if they couldn’t believe that it could happen in Britain: they did not give the news the headline spot, they started live reporting and then removed it several times and even kept claiming that it could be “some pyros” or a “blown speaker” or a “faulty lighting fixture” when other news outlets were already reporting multiple fatalities.

Since the BBC is nothing but a propaganda arm of the British government, it reflected the shock and awe and the utter disbelief that the lower tiers of the British government and the British elites were experiencing in the wake of the bombing.

Why couldn’t they believe it?

They couldn’t believe it was happening in Britain because of the sheer amount of effort they put into controlling Islamist terror, nurturing it, diverting it elsewhere and encouraging and even guiding it to hit other places and nations.

For example, MI6 set up and curates the so-called “Syrian Observatory”, a terrorist propaganda front, and the British government has been using it to shift the wrath of Islamists on other anti-terror actors like the United States, France or Assad’s Syria itself. There are many other such examples.

Not only the British government encourages Islamist terror, it has penetrated it with multiple agents, it sponsors and leads it on in the hope that there is only so much of it in the world and while Islamist terror is targeting other nations there won’t be enough left to hit Britain with.

Quite cynically the British government and its top security MI5 and MI6 goons believe that while terrorist acts are happening elsewhere Britain is safe and the safer the more there is Islamist terror elsewhere. For this reason they work hard to encourage Islamists to hit various other nations, like France, Belgium, Sweden etc.

Recently the British government said it could withdraw intelligence from the EU post-Brexit thereby de-facto threatening France and other EU nations with acts of Islamist terror by factions that they control and also by factions that they don’t control outright but influence and attempt to guide with their propaganda.

However, while the lower tiers of the British government and the ruling elites were in a state of disbelief, those at the very top were much better informed.

There is a distinct probability that the whole heinous thing could have been ordered from the very top of the British security apparatus.

There should be no doubt that MI5 was directly or indirectly involved in the atrocity as they had been in the previous such acts.

Cui bono analysis definitely implicates the current conservative British government as the only ones standing (and hoping) to gain and benefit from the terrorist act, and MI5 (and MI6) are their servants, the former being Britain’s internal state Gestapo-style terror police, the latter, the external branch of the same.

Salman Abedi was again “known to MI5” (which is really code for MI5 agents) and yet was allowed to operate with impunity, including apparent multiple trips to war zones in Syria and Libya.

In the police state of Britain – with near total round-the-clock surveillance of everyone, it can only mean that he was being used by the MI5 either directly or indirectly.

Either he had been recruited by MI5 and was their agent or they watched and allowed him to operate, possibly leading him on as they like to do.

The reasons for such criminal behavior are too many to enumerate all.

For starters, Cui bono analysis indicates the bombing is generally thought to favor PM May and to undermine Corbin in the forthcoming elections so could be directly ordered by her or her top government goons.

For the main course, there’s the fact that MI5 still needs to eat meaning funding, status, promotions and decorations and there is nothing like a terror bombing to achieve all that and to secure the future for the foreseeable as it was done on 7/7.

Also, the bomb appears too sophisticated so could be the work of MI5 technicians.

What’s more, the choice of target – mainly pre-teen and teen girls – is also consistent with MI5 (and MI6) involvement where there is institutionalized hate of children, women and especially young women for the reason of these agencies of the British state being dominated by individuals with criminal homosexual and pedophiliac / pedophobic tendencies which is well documented.

In sum, while the British elites were in utter disbelief given how they are good friends with Islamist terror, the very select few in Britain have a much better knowledge of the reasons for, and the genesis of, the bombing carried out by the fall guy Abedi.

How Many Dead “Terrorists” is the US Budget Worth?

April 16, 2017

Recently the Trump administration ordered (or allowed) the U.S. military now headed by the certifiable loon Mattis to drop their most powerful non-nuclear bomb, the MOAB, on some mountain in occupied Afghanistan.

The bomb caused a minor earthquake and allegedly succeeded in killing 34 IS “terrorists”.

Aside from the moral of labeling people terrorists and killing them indiscriminately by some dumb, if powerful, bomb, here is what else transpires.

A bomb costing US$ 314 million kills 34 IS “terrorists” which makes it US$ 8.7 million per “terrorist” which means the 2017 US budget is good for killing… 6,880 “terrorists”!

I trust you will find there’s many more.

Also, China has nothing to worry about, not now, not ever.

Is US or UK Behind False-Flag Sarin Attack in Syria?

April 9, 2017

The timing is suspicious.

No motive can be ascribed to President Assad.

The only ones that are benefiting are anti-Assads and hard-core Western terrorism-inciting and funding governments like those of the US and UK in particular.

It has never been shown conclusively that Assad’s forces ever committed any chemical attack in Syria.

In fact, in 2013 when the last red-line Sarin attack took place, Carla Del Ponte, a UN official, said on record that victims’ accounts rather pointed to the rebels’ involvement.

So is the US or the UK orchestrated the appalling gas attack?

I think, the impulse definitely came from somewhere in the bowels of the Trump administration but it was likely the British government that physically committed the heinous act in Idlib Province, Syria, through its agents there by launching a chemical Sarin gas attack as a result of which 100 people, including 21 children, died.

The attack has all the hallmarks of a US-ordered and British-executed atrocity.

We have seen it before, including during this ongoing tragic civil war in Syria which is only benefiting those who want to put down and bleed the entire Arab world (aka the US and Britain, also some in the EU).

My analysis of limited and heavily distorted information as well MSM decoding implicates the British government, its secret services and local agents, including so called White Helmets and British sponsored rebels and other British agents, in this attack.

The attack follows the similar pattern of previous false-flag chemical attacks in Syria apparently carried out by British government agents where they deployed chemical agents on a number of occasions targeting own civilians in rebel-controlled territories and then quickly publicized said attacks using fake social media accounts, puppet paid bloggers and twitter users on the ground and around the world and bogus groups like the London-based so-called “Syrian Observatory” which was set up and is curated by MI6.

However Britain could be double-dealing here and this attack also appears to be the latest step in the British government’s month-long campaign to undermine President Trump personally (probably in cahoots with some forces in the Trump administration itself and larger political establishment in Washington, D.C., aka the “swamp”) by making it impossible for him to carry out his pre-election promises which included a possible deal with Assad.

While making out as if taking and obeying orders from the US, the British government secretly also wants to involve the United States in another lengthy and preferably bloody war to shift attention from itself hoping that terrorists will then target US rather than British interests.

Death Toll of Capitalism: Closer to 2 Billion

March 23, 2017

The centenary of the Russian revolution is approaching fast which makes it a good time to look at the crimes of Capitalism worldwide, specifically at the horrendous and so far unsurpassed death toll of Capitalism.

Here is an incomplete list:

75,000 Second Boer War

100,000 Japanese Massacre of Singapore

116,000 Burma-Siam Railroad Construction

200,000 Japanese Germ Warfare in China

300,000 Rebelling Shia Killed by Saddam

300,000 US Bombing of Yugoslavia

500,000 US Bombing Iraq Water Supply ‘91

700,000 US Civil War

1,000,000 Iraq-Iran War

1,000,000 US sanctions on Iraq

1,200,000 US Backed Suharto

1,500,000 Irish Potato Famine

5,964,000 Japanese Democides

7,000,000 Famine of 1932-33

10,000,000 Bengal Famine of 1943

30,000,000 Famine in British India

5,000,000 US Intervention in the Congo

1,000,000 Indonesian Anti-Communist Purge

1,000,000 Stateless (Anarcho-Capitalist) Somalia

100,000 Industrial Revolution USA

3,000,000 US-Philippine War

826,626 Palestinians Killed by Israel

300,000 Guatemala

300,000 Nanking Massacre

400,000 Iraq (Gas sold to Saddam)

500,000 Iraq (Desert Storm)

650,000 Invasion of the Philippines

1,200,000 Invasion of Afghanistan

1,300,000 Invasion of Iraq

3,500,000 South African Apartheid Regime Death Toll

6,000,000 US intervention in Latin America and brutal US-backed military dictatorships

6,000,000 Japanese Imperialism

10,000,000 Vietnam War, including Cambodia and Laos

10,000,000 Korean War

20,000,000 British Occupation of India

12,000,000 Great Depression (America alone)

16,500,000 World War One

60,000,000 World War Two

95,000,000 Native American Genocide

120,000,000 Capitalist Policy in India 1947 – 1990

150,000,000 African Slave Trade

30,000 US Backed murder of Tamils

100,000 Spanish-American War

400,000 Spanish Civil War

15,000 Union Carbide Bhopal Disaster

20,000 Massacre of the Paris Commune

1,500,000 First Indochina 1946-1954

1,000,000 Colonization of the Belgian Congo

80,000 French Madagascar

1,000,000 Nigerian Civil War

1,000,000 Rwandan Genocide

100,000 US Made Famine Bangladesh

5,256,000 Children Died fr Hunger ‘09

235,000,000 Children Killed by Hunger Since 9/11

100,000,000 Children Killed by Hunger during the 1990s

h/t

22 March 2017 London Attack: MI5 Strikes Again

March 23, 2017

Today, one day after the March 22, 2017 terrorist attack on the Westminster bridge in London, there is an admission that the attacker “was known to MI5”.

“Was known to MI5” is actually code for MI5 agents who go rogue and commit terrorist atrocities or who commit atrocities without actually going rogue.

Whether he was rogue or not, there is a very strong case for the culpability of MI5 in this latest terrorist atrocity as in the previous ones.

It is inconceivable that in the repressive police state that is Britain today anyone could commit such an act without the support of, or a card blanche from, MI5, Britain’s GESTAPO style internal state police, much less someone who “was known to MI5”.

Did MI5 do it again?

MI5

A Brief History of U.S. Fuckery: Over 100 Interventions Since 1890

February 15, 2017

Quoting below from Dr. Zoltan Grossman’s History of U.S. Military Interventions, an important piece of research that puts things into perspective.

FROM WOUNDED KNEE TO SYRIA:

A CENTURY OF U.S. MILITARY INTERVENTIONS

by Dr. Zoltan Grossman

The following is a partial list of U.S. military interventions from 1890 to 2014.

Below the list is a Briefing on the History of U.S. Military Interventions.

The list and briefing are also available as a powerpoint presentation.

This guide does not include:

  • mobilizations of the National Guard
  • offshore shows of naval strength
  • reinforcements of embassy personnel
  • the use of non-Defense Department personnel (such as the Drug Enforcement Administration)
  • military exercises
  • non-combat mobilizations (such as replacing postal strikers)
  • the permanent stationing of armed forces
  • covert actions where the U.S. did not play a command and control role
  • the use of small hostage rescue units
  • most uses of proxy troops
  • U.S. piloting of foreign warplanes
  • foreign or domestic disaster assistance
  • military training and advisory programs not involving direct combat
  • civic action programs
  • and many other military activities.

Among sources used, beside news reports, are the Congressional Record (23 June 1969), 180 Landings by the U.S. Marine Corp History Division, Ege & Makhijani in Counterspy (July-Aug, 1982), “Instances of Use of United States Forces Abroad, 1798-1993” by Ellen C. Collier of the Library of Congress Congressional Research Service, and Ellsberg in Protest & Survive.

Versions of this list have been published on Zmag.org, Neravt.com, and numerous other websites.

Translations of list: Spanish French Turkish Italian Chinese Greek Russian Czech Tamil Portuguese

Quotes in Christian Science Monitor and The Independent

Turkish newspaper urges that the United States be listed in Guinness Book of World Records as the Country with the Most Foreign Interventions.

Read the rest of this entry »

HST on America, Not the First Time

January 29, 2017

Assorted self-described liberals are up in arms against President Trump’s recent executive order banning refugees and nationals of certain countries.

But really this is nothing new and, what’s more, something very insignificant compared to what some of his predecessors were able to get away with.

To illustrate, here is a quote from Kingdom of Fear by Hunter S. Thompson.

But this is not the first time civil liberties have been eroded in the face of national crises. Abraham Lincoln suspended the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus, Woodrow Wilson had his Palmer raids and Franklin Roosevelt interred Asian American citizen for no reason, other than their national origin.

Smother Party

January 16, 2017

To continue my series of posts titled Classics on America or Britain, here is a quote from Naked Lunch by William S. Burroughs, in which he describes a time-honored English custom.

This is a rural English custom designed to eliminate aged and bedfast dependents. A family so afflicted throws a “smother party” where the guests pile mattresses on the old liability, climb up on top of the mattresses and lush themselves out.

Nice, isn’t it.

I guess, what with the current sorry state of the NHS, this type of entertainment may well be on the rise in the UK.

The American equivalent is known more prosaically as the “Mattress Party” which actually might also become more prevalent once Obamacare gets truly repealed by the Reptilians… ahem… Republicans.

And, while I am at it, here a quote on America (meaning the USofA) from same:

America is not a young land: it is old and dirty and evil before the settlers, before the Indians. The evil is there waiting.

Well, nothing new here.


%d bloggers like this: